// industries · aerospace and mro
One system from RFQ to delivery — under ITAR, EAR, and MIL-STD-129.
The Mad Botter deploys and operates one platform inside your compliance boundary — deterministic capture at the edge, a sovereign data layer, and pipelines on top. For aerospace and MRO that means jobs, parts, repair status, documentation, chain of custody, labels, compliance, and equipment condition connected to one record — with your legacy data migrated into it.
> where is part 4471, and what condition is it in?
x board: "warehouse" · sheet: stale · tag: paper label
> deploy operational_core --self-hosted
+ one relational job · rfq → delivery
+ rfid tag ↔ job ↔ mil label ↔ tcn ↔ dod scan
+ storage condition monitored · alerts before scrap
// illustrative — not customer data
// the operating reality
The ERP records the transaction. It does not run the shop.
The real operation lives in boards, spreadsheets, a shared document store nobody can query, and a library of hand-built templates. An order's history migrates from one system to the next as it ages, stitched together by reference numbers typed by hand. There is no single system of record — and no reliable way to answer where a part is and what condition it is in.
Monday.com boards an order physically migrated through as it aged — RFQ, orders, warehouse, finance, archive.
Line items imported out of those boards into core operational models, each one hanging off a single relational job.
A shared archive with no relationship to the jobs, shipments, and labels the documents belonged to.
Boards were stitched together only by free-text reference numbers typed by hand.
// what the system connects
Built around the workflow, not the org chart
Quote to order to warehouse to finance as one relational job that keeps a single identity from the RFQ through delivery — instead of a record that physically migrates from board to board as it ages.
Every document, shipment, label, and tag hangs off the job it belongs to. Asset moves, check-outs, and check-ins are logged with location, timestamp, operator, condition, and calibration state — so an auditor can reconstruct where anything has been.
MIL-STD-129 labels as one-click print-ready output to warehouse label printers, with RFID tag records cross-referencing the job, the label, the Transportation Control Number, and the DoD scan.
Sensor gateways streaming temperature, humidity, pressure, vibration, and moisture against per-asset thresholds — so corrosion risk on high-value inventory raises an alert instead of showing up as scrap.
// what you could ask
Questions your system should answer instantly
// yours to control
Controlled data stays inside the boundary you already defend.
If you supply aerospace and defense programs, "move it to a shared cloud" is not an architecture. The system is self-hosted on infrastructure you own, with least-privilege access and an audit trail on every query — and air-gap-capable where the work requires it.
$ deploy operational_core --target on_prem
+ postgres · worker · audit — all local
+ least-privilege roles · every query logged
$ export operational_data → public_cloud
x denied by policy
// illustrative — not customer data
// faq
Aerospace and MRO — straight answers
Do we have to replace our ERP?
Usually not. The ERP records the transaction; the problem is normally the operation around it — the boards, spreadsheets, document archives, and hand-built templates where the work actually moves. We build the operational system in that gap and integrate with what stays.
Can this run inside our ITAR/EAR boundary?
Yes. The system is self-hosted on infrastructure you own, with least-privilege access and an audit trail, and is air-gap-capable where the work requires it. We are designed to support your compliance posture — we do not certify compliance.
Can you handle MIL-STD-129 labeling and RFID?
We have built exactly that. On a live deployment, MIL-STD-129 labels generate as print-ready PDFs and stream to warehouse Zebra printers as ZPL with Code 128 and Data Matrix/PDF417 barcodes, and RFID tag records cross-reference the job, the MIL label, the shipment’s Transportation Control Number, and the DoD scan.
Our operation runs on boards and spreadsheets. Can you migrate that?
Yes — that is the normal starting condition. On the aerospace deployment we imported roughly 14,000 line items out of fifteen Monday boards into one relational system, ending the hand-typed reference numbers that were the only thing connecting them.
What does it cost to start?
The First Line Pilot is $1,500 flat — thirty days, one production line, and a machine-verifiable finish you check against the floor rather than a report you have to trust. Full platform deployment is scoped against your actual systems after that, because by then we both know what they are.
// where to start
Start with the line that is costing you the most.
The First Line Pilot is $1,500 flat: thirty days, one production line, a machine-verifiable finish. We deploy the platform on your hardware, instrument one line, and run it in production — you judge the result on the record it produces.
Fixed price, fixed scope, no discovery theater.